some comments coming together in my mind: Peter Bishop of Varuna saying that the manuscripts that get his attention are the ones that say "look at me, look what I'm doing". and Athol Fugard saying on the book show of a particular play, that it was the one that he knew was him writing in his own voice, saying something no one else could say. and a review of a poetry book in the paper at the weekend, suggesting that in a small hothouse like Australia, mediocrity can get too much attention. and I wonder: is it worth doing if it isn't unique? if someone else can do it, why do it?
Previous Posts
- watermark literary muster
- a bit of a hiatus: having spent a week cutting a n...
- varuna fellowships
- Event's reading service
- uwa press: creative writing courses writing
- government recreation portal. really.
- australian public intellectual network. now there'...
- writing is really the only art where you have to w...
- short fuse poetry compilation
- I was going to make another blog for the sandbox; ...
William Gibson
Rob Walker
Other stuff
Victorian Writers' Centre Journals
Southerly
Andromeda submissions
Cardigan Press
wetink
Literature and aesthetics
Jacket online magazine - with links
Colloquy - postgrad writings
McSweeney's
Publishers
Subscribe to
Comments [Atom]
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home